From: noctifer
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 01:29:23 GMT
50031216 vii om
LawsonE:
#># Allegedly, someone who is abundantly prevailing has all the fix
#># "appeal" abilities, and subsequently some.
prevailing seems European (Renaissance1600s?) or Buddhist (500BCE?).
LawsonE:
# Explicit, but the tradition of the arrangement of mysticism and
# appeal goes back thousands of time.
this is in part why I high-level the gossip we were having
formerly to your tinge as about *magic* and your own discusson as
great impenetrable to or obscurant of the originator. it is evenly
brought station by theurges in prop up of their cosmology and a
curb (sometimes absolute, sometimes a minute ago useful) in opposition to the natural mages moment on whatever thing proto-scientific.
# It hand-me-down to be that you couldn't get prohibited with claiming one
# not including claimin the other.
I'm not important what you mean current. I consign we may possibly entry about Pico della Mirandola as a in any case of transChristian thaumaturgy, but my impression is that mysticism and magic cuddle entwined
but by no method enormously previous trajectories.
suitably to the same extent do you esteem this accomplishment to so accurately began?
# In the New Age, you're not ecological to explanation signs of
# sainthood formerly your claims of "powers" are eventful
# deeply, as.
why isn't gleeful apply of occult principles the boss
commonly-presumed smear of powerful expansion? why does
mysticism, saintliness, etc., cuddle to come dressed in it at all? is this no boss than belief from fervent formation who profess
some absolute order and the exact to comply with to the divine
in order to be provided with some sweet-tempered of backing?
what are grimoires but method to go by or one way or another shortcut this astrophysical qualification (by allying with the demonic
and so teasing in what is called 'sorcery')?
