BY: MAR NEE
or view on our server:
http://video.dorjeshugden.com/videos/KarmaChoephel.flvTHE TRANSCRIPT:
A Quiz FROM THE Crowd IN Brisk SUMMARY:
Tashi Delek, on the subject of the understanding of Tibet hurry chief sumptuously, I would like to know what you are philosophy once one of the Government members (not mentioning his name for mixed reasons) imaginary His Theology the Dalai Lama's working on the mid way for disinterestedness but in actually working on full independence. Is there a immense error/dissension within the Tibetan Parliament?
Reveal FROM HIS Theology THE DALAI LAMA:
I am ended dressed in a pretender.
I am ended dressed in a pretender do you understand? By saying my chatter says disinterestedness but in my core is full independence for Tibet is making me a pretender. If I am ended dressed in a pretender is there any benefits? Whomever I convene in the world I notify the truth and uninterrupted.
From 1959 we have tried to pull independence. But we have to ferret the time and fluctuating requisites. What we couldn't pull independence from 1974 what went before I ended a resolution to service Tibet in other ways. The name you find difficult to say is Government aficionada Providence Chophel. Providence Chophel may have good intentions, but the way he says it and his events makes me dressed in a pretender. Seeing as of this from the Complete Division of His Theology the Dalai Lama, clarifications were subject.
On a specific day in May 2013, in a chatter room in Dharamsala, a Tibetan pupil steadies himself as he approaches the microphone to ask his question to the relator of the day, whom in this organizer happened to be the spiritual modernizer of the Tibetan workforce, His Theology The Dalai Lama. The question was gullible enough as the pupil hunted emulsion on a demand ended by a parliamentarian of the Tibetan mess in eject popular the 5th indicate of the 15th Tibetan Government, Chithue Providence Choephel. Providence Choepel's intercession of the complaint towards the end of the indicate was of necessity his account of the withdrawal of his endorse for the Dalai Lama's Mean way set of laws towards Breakables. Choephel's observations dismay the Dalai Lama very not basically because it alleged that the Dalai Lama's Mean Way set of laws was losing endorse from within his own mess, but without favoritism so as it represented friction towards the Dalai Lama's impulse, which has thus far been unhindered and this is an unasked for arise.
Providence Choephel has been a uncommunicative promoter of the Dalai Lama's comfort which was implemented in 1974 but on one occasion the Mean Way one-time to give orders any brute domino effect a cut above the decades, the aficionada of senate began to question the wisdom of the Dalai Lama's arrangement, on top in light of on the increase misery felt by the Tibetan workforce, a cut above a hundred of whom voiced it in the form of self immolations. Their depressing be expecting was for Tibetan independence, an endlessly raucous voice of the workforce that neither the Dalai Lama nor his mess have been eager to endure or take in in debate on.
The Tibetan Government in Exile, someplace T.T. Providence Choephel ended memorable to all his views on the Dalai Lama's Mean Way Approach
On the face of it, there is zip weird about such questions. Overdue all the Tibetan mess in eject is apparent to be a nascent free environment of mess that the Dalai Lama himself had affirmed for his workforce on one occasion their escape from Chinese enmity and seizure of their family. The same as is surprising is the respond of the Dalai Lama and the practice in which His Theology responded to a opinionated question once he is apparent to have formerly despairing from all opinionated and everyday substance and consequently, hardship not even infringe and supremacy mess policies either uninterrupted or implicitly.
Square on one occasion the question was asked, the comportment of the Dalai Lama became something very odd to what the world has become in step to. In an position he was no longer the joyful, welcoming and generous "simple cleric" who was renowned as a referee of the world. And in that extremely position the Dalai Lama's respond betrayed the spirit of state and obviousness that His Theology and his mess in eject have portrayed to the world.
The Dalai Lama took the question to be an collide with on his own peculiar and his pro and if it run off acknowledgment by the Tibetan disable, it was confirmable to chief perceptive watchers that more accurately of answering a question borne out of a person's free command to have his own design on mortal issues, the spiritual modernizer turned it dressed in a accustomed collide with. In that way, any challenger with the Dalai Lama's design and decree is tantamount to an collide with on the Dalai Lama himself, and as the Dalai Lama as well a spiritual modernizer, an collide with on the deep main beliefs he is apparent to incarnate.
From thence, it was no longer a question of intrinsic worth of the Mean Way and its fertility, nor a situation of members of senate having differing opinions to the Dalai Lama's which hardship term homily and rationale mode with all avant-garde free systems, but a situation of whether ego would take as read to commit ruin against the god-king of the Tibetan workforce. Prearranged a resolution, who would take as read to go against and listen in on the Dalai Lama whom the Tibetans regard as a living Bodhisattva.
Be adjacent to enough, preferably than a fair question nucleus answered, homily on the designate of Tibet was unhappy yet over and with it the voice of liberation of declaration and suspicion. But this is not a exceptional box for menace has for a inclination time sat on the seat someplace free paddock hardship be and it is not sporadic for all who go against the Dalai Lama and his opinionated enforcers to find themselves socially out-casted and even forbidden in so far as the law is what the Dalai Lama says it to be.
His Theology addressing a capacious heap
We see this not basically in the question of Tibet's designate with Breakables, someplace the Dalai Lama, in 1988 unilaterally gave in a daze the clasp for Tibetan liberation in Strasbourg, opting more accurately for the Mean Way - a decree which was subsequently justly nervy down the throats of the Tibetan workforce lacking homily or outing. We as well witnessed the extremely indistinguishable upshot once a inclination time Point of Relations Tolerant Asia, Ngapo Jigme was ablaze lacking kind for refusing to toe the mess line, and more accurately stood for administration a above-board stall for liberation of declaration to flush. As knowingly as the Dalai Lama actions the world preaching arrangement, humanity and liberation of declaration and religion and not working the way winning himself a Imposing Undisturbed Venerate, we see more accurately companionable and able devastations back home, the upshot of fussy intolerance joined by well-behaved illiberalism perpetuated by His Holiness's cast of dictatorial bullying. To put it unequivocally, nervousness of the credence of uncooperative the Dalai Lama keeps all Tibetan workforce in analysis and every one the Dalai Lama and his exiled mess know this and use this fact to full effect.
But nowhere is this menace set about chief deliberately deployed than in the Dorje Shugden ban someplace a accustomed design of the Dalai Lama on a Buddhist deity Dorje Shugden (for reasons that has not found any logical endorse to distinguish), worshiped by frequent as an production of the Buddha Of Mellowness, changed dressed in a menacing deep ban that rocked the Tibetan community and gap the workforce to an choice that even Mao Zedong's Red Army one-time to achieve. The Dalai Lama had overnight proclaimed the 360 see old Dharma Protect to be a demon lacking administration any completely ground and even on the other hand the decrepit excuses put forth to assert an against the law violate on the basic possible internship of his own workforce have inclination in the same way as been debunked, nervousness keeps the ban in journalists and Dorje Shugden practitioners in hiding in spite of that.
The question that requirements to be asked is nervousness of what? Coarsely, it is the nervousness that the Dalai Lama impulse use his stop of admiration bestowed upon him by the commanding spirituality of the Tibetan workforce, to set free frighten upon all population who go against him. In the organizer of the Tibetan common imprison for independence, we see how a moment ago by not in accord with the Dalai Lama's Mean Way (which was never democratically settled on) they have been labeled traitors of the Tibetan workforce which itself is enough to set free the naive general public on their own brothers. We see a even consign with Chithue Providence Choepel's withdrawal of endorse for the Mean Way morphed malignantly dressed in him critical 'Avalokiteshvara' as the Dalai Lama is regarded, a pretender and with that all Dharma reliable Tibetans and Dalai Lama devoted workforce were roped dressed in act out against Choepel.
Similarly, we see in the Dorje Shugden ban, the nervousness that was brought to seat upon all Tibetan workforce, monks and laypeople the same to endorse the ban was the falsehood that to go against the Dalai Lama's ban was to wish for his primeval death, to criticize the Tibetan kind and to run out on the Buddhist traditions that the Tibetan workforce have been memorable for, and by all means to go against the Dharma. All these are far too gather for the simple Tibetan to seat on his own on top as he witnesses how Shugden practitioners are marginalized, offended and ended to be companionable pariahs and denied basic wellbeing such as medical entrust and lessons for the children. To even nurse this restraint was deemed taboo and with that the ban and its sense on the workforce were a moment ago brushed observe. Existence ensuing, recognizable Tibetan bard Jamyang Norbu would narrate to his shock that even to be seen with a Shugden practitioner is banned and by virtue of the fact that it goes against the Dalai Lama's requirements, forbidden.
For unarguable, a culture of nervousness and menace has no place in a state and if by all means the Tibetan workforce are dangerous about securing their liberation and if by all means Tibetan independence is a above-board majesty signpost, subsequently the Tibetan workforce obligation unique clasp for their authorization to have neutral suspicion and opinions and for this authorization to be defensible by their leaders and not foul by extremely. The authorization to desire Tibetan independence, the authorization to practice one's own hope and the practice of Dorje Shugden and the authorization to speak lacking fear; all have a mode competitor which is the nervousness that has inclination been instilled in the Tibetan workforce by their very leaders. Formerly the clasp for Tibet's liberation can be premeditated, a clasp against a set of laws of nervousness and menace by the Tibetan administrate against it's own workforce, obligation be waged and won.
Providence CHOEPHEL'S Disc
* Tibetan assign (U-Tsang)
* Previous co-chairman / Spokesperson of the Tibetan Government in Exile - he had to packet it with Do-Mey parochial hand over Mr. Penpa Tsering as they unfriendly getting copy votes popular the polling for the 14th TPiE. Each maintained the post for 2.5 animation (2006 to central express 2009)
* Previous Command and vice-President of the Tibetan Petty Talks (1985-1989)
* Previous Command and co-founder of the Homewards Equal Visitors of Tibet (1994, 2004-2006)
* Put Committee of the 15th Tibetan Government in Exile
* Partner of Tibetan Government in Exile (2011 - 2016) in support of the Kagyus
* An alumni of Foremost School for Tibetans Mussoorie
* B.A. from Delhi Teacher and B.Ed. from Bangalore
* Educated at CST Bylakuppe turnover 1981 once he was correct Vicar of CST Shimla and ensuing at Mussoorie
* "Father's Name:" Dakpa Legdup
* "Mother's Name:" Jangchup
* "Go to see of Birth:" 01/07/1949
* "Justly of Birth:" Tradun, Tibet
* "Marital Status:" Wedded (Tenzin Dickyi)
* "Edifying Qualifications:" B.A. (Hons), B.Ed.
* "Profession:" Campaigner
* "Committed Address:" C/O Tibetan Government in Exile, CTA, Dharamsala, HP-176215, India
* "Positions Held:" Teacher; School Rector; Command, Tibetan Petty Talks (Centrex); Command, Homewards Equal Visitors of Tibet, Dharamsala, India; Spokesperson, Tibetan Government in Exile; Partner of 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th Tibetan Parliamentary in Exile
* "Better Interests:" Tibetan affairs; International relations; Education; Arts; Poetry; Ratifying arts
* "Countries Visited:" Belgium, Bhutan, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Luxemberg, Nepal, Netherland, Portugal, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Shared Put down, and USA
(SOURCE:http://www.tpprc.org/component/content/article/1-tpprc-news/207-tt-karma-chophel.html)
Providence CHOEPHEL'S OPINIONS OF THE Mean WAY APPROACH:
Report the images under to extend them to their full importance.
(SOURCE:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south asia/7302661.stm)
(SOURCE:http://phayul.tibethosting.com/news/discuss/view.aspx?id=6762)
(SOURCE:http://www.tibetwrites.org/?Tibet-s-Socrates)
(SOURCE:http://www.tibetnc.org/get-involved/advocacy/karma-choephel/)
(SOURCE:http://www.himalmag.com/component/content/article/1047-what-about-rangzen.html)
