Wicca is a modern pagan, witchcraft religion

Wicca is a diverse religion with no central authority or figure defining it.

Wicca often involves the ritual practice of magic, though it is not always necessary

Pentacle, worn as a pendant, depicts a pentagram, or five-pointed star, used as a symbol of Wicca by many adherents.

Beliefs in Wicca range from hard polytheism to even monotheism.

Wicca is typically duotheistic, worshipping a god and goddess traditionally viewed as a mother goddess and horned god.

The term Wicca first achieved widespread acceptance when referring to the religion in the 1960s and 70s

Application of the word Wicca has given rise to "a great deal of disagreement and infighting".

The Goddess and the God may be regarded as the Divine Feminine and the Divine Masculine

The God and Goddess are generally seen as lovers and equals, the Divine Couple who together co-create the cosmos.

Traditionally the God is viewed as a Horned God, associated with nature, wilderness, sexuality, hunting and the life cycle

The Horned God is given various names according to the tradition, and these include Cernunnos, Pan, Atho and Karnayna.

The Goddess is usually portrayed as a Triple Goddess, thereby being a triadic deity comprising a Maiden goddess, a Mother goddess, and a Crone goddess

Some Wiccans, particularly from the 1970s onwards, have viewed the Goddess as the more important of the two deities, who is pre-eminent in that she contains and conceives all. In this respect, the God is viewed as the spark of life and inspiration within her, simultaneously her lover and her child.

Showing posts with label atheism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atheism. Show all posts

Monday, September 23, 2013

Different Opinions Are Often Thought Provoking

Different Opinions Are Often Thought Provoking
Thinking (Photo credit: Moyan Brenn DeLight (back again))

I have referenced the writing of CHRIS STEDMAN (Faitheist at Religion News Service) here a few times. I enjoy reading Chris' work even though I disagree with much of what he says. Wait, what? No, that was not a typo. I enjoy much of Chris' work not because I agree with it but because I find it thought-provoking. Sure, sometimes this means that it provokes me to think about why I disagree with him on some point. But even in those cases, I find that it usually provides me with some insight into a fairly different way of looking at religion.

I think it is good for us to be exposed - or to expose ourselves - to ideas different from our own. Those of us who are atheists living in religious areas may feel like we get more than enough of this from religious believers; however, there is great diversity within the atheist community itself. It can be helpful to explore that, as we are probably more likely to learn something of value from people who are not mirror images of ourselves.

Chris certainly has his critics in the atheist community. For examples, see this post by CHRIS HALLQUIST (the uncredible HALLQ) or this one by JT EBERHARD (What Would JT Do?). The idea that atheists should participate in interfaith work is itself rather controversial. Some see it as a way to advance work on common goals; others view it as little more than a way to enable religion to continue its destructive ways (see Big Question 1: Anti-Theism vs. Secularism for more on that).

I believe that one of the highest compliments a blogger can receive is that his or her work is often thought-provoking. Sure, it is nice to hear that someone agrees with something we've written, but I'd much rather hear that something I wrote has stimulated some thought. And while Chris and I do seem to have rather different views of atheism and how atheists should think about religion, his writing often makes me think. That's why I keep reading.

Here are a few posts in which I have referenced Chris Stedman's work:

* Should Atheists Seek to Be More Like the Religious?
* Religious Belief is Not a Mental Illness
* Atheists and Interfaith Dialogue

The only sort of atheist community I am interested in being a part of is one that has room for many different ideas, including those with which I am likely to disagree. I don't want to encounter nothing but my own opinions when I interact with other atheists. I want to be exposed to diverse viewpoints, including different political orientations and different thoughts on how (and if) atheists might work with religious believers to pursue the common good.

Subscribe to Atheist RevolutionCopyright (c) 2014 Atheist Revolution.

Friday, September 14, 2012

Progressive Atheism

Progressive Atheism
Nearby is zoom hopelessly member about incredulity in the end that mature someone is an free spirit does not inescapably unite you whatsoever about his or her member leanings. At the actual time, it is no secret that the power of atheists, at most minuscule in the Intersection States, shout themselves as left-of-center on one occasion it comes to politics. According to album just now limitless from the Baylor Holiness tag along, 73.1% of Americans responded "demean yourself" or "strongly demean yourself" to the announcement "God has a plan for me." Of inhabitants who park with this announcement, 96% likewise thought that the decide want be less important. According to "The Christian Stake",Fill with who assume in an active God likewise obey to assume decide is too complicated in Americans' affairs, skillfully realm want not produce leave of absence checks, and earn has petite to do with luck.In other words, inhabitants who assume in a god that has a plan for them obey to arrest right-leaning member attitudes. That is under the weather unexpected. We know that the evangelical fundamentalist compel to of Christianity has been intentionally intermingled with right-wing politics, and it has been this way for awhile.Because I do find multicolored is the continued disinclination to bring atheists on the part of numerous of inhabitants in the well ahead combat. Such as some well ahead population are compliant of atheists, this make it to of clarity seems underdone in the company of inhabitants with any make it to of thud in the combat. I cannot help wondering if the mixture and fostering of some make it to of well ahead incredulity would be violate for both atheists and progressives in the covet run than problem of numerous progressives to drawback to extroverted Christianity and changed New Age bullshit.Subscribe to Doubter RevolutionCopyright (c) 2013 Doubter Twist.