Plan To Exterminate 7 Billion People Publicised

TAP. MAKE NO MISTAKE. SOMEONE HAS DECIDED TO CUT THE EARTH'S POPULATION BY 90%. THEY EVEN BUILT A MONUMENT TO THE FACT THAT THIS IS THEIR PLAN. THAT'S HOW POWERFUL THE WORLD GOVERNMENT IS. THEY CAN PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE THE DEATHS OF 7 BILLION PEOPLE, AND NO ONE SAYS A WORD.

FROM RADIOLIBERTY WEBSITE

Advertisement

Privacy Remove AdsOn one of the highest hilltops in Elbert County, GEORGIA stands a huge granite monument. Engraved in eight different languages on the four giant stones that support the common capstone are 10 Guides, or commandments. That monument is alternately referred to as THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES, or the "American Stonehenge". Though relatively unknown to most people, it is an important link to the Occult Hierarchy that dominates the world in which we live.

The origin of that strange monument is shrouded in mystery because no one knows the true identity of the man, or men, who commissioned its construction. All that is known for certain is that in June 1979, a well-dressed, articulate stranger visited the office of the Elberton Granite Finishing Company and announced that he wanted to build an edifice to transmit a message to mankind.

He identified himself as R. C. CHRISTIAN, but it soon became apparent that was not his real name. He said that he represented a group of men who wanted to offer direction to humanity, but to date, almost two decades later, no one knows who R. C. CHRISTIAN really was, or the names of those he represented. Several things are apparent. The messages engraved on the Georgia Guidestones deal with four major fields:(1) Governance and the establishment of a world government(2) Population and reproduction control(3) The environment and man's relationship to nature(4) SpiritualityIn the public library in Elberton, I found a book written by the man who called himself R.C. CHRISTIAN. I discovered that the monument he commissioned had been erected in recognition of THOMAS PAINE and the occult philosophy he espoused. Indeed, the Georgia Guidestones are used for occult ceremonies and mystic celebrations to this very day. Tragically, only one religious leader in the area had the courage to speak out against the American Stonehenge, and he has recently relocated his ministry.

THE MESSAGE OF THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.

3. Unite humanity with a living new language.

4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.

5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.

6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.

7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.

8. Balance personal rights with social duties.

9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.

10. Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.Limiting the population of the earth to 500 million will require the EXTERMINATION OF NINE-TENTHS OF THE WORLD'S PEOPLE. The American Stonehenge's reference to establishing a world court foreshadows the current move to create an International Criminal Court and a world government. The GUIDESTONES' emphasis on preserving nature anticipates the environmental movement of the 1990s, and the reference to "seeking harmony with the infinite" reflects the current effort to replace Judeo-Christian beliefs with a new spirituality.

The message of the American Stonehenge also foreshadowed the current drive for Sustainable Development. Any time you hear the phrase "Sustainable Development" used, you should substitute the term "socialism" to be able to understand what is intended. Later in this syllabus you will read the full text of the EARTH CHARTER which was compiled under the direction of MIKHAIL GORBACHEV and MAURICE STRONG.

In that document you will find an emphasis on the same basic issues:

* CONTROL OF REPRODUCTION

* WORLD GOVERNANCE

* THE IMPORTANCE OF NATURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT

* A NEW SPIRITUALITY

THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE IDEAS ENGRAVED ON THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES and those espoused in the EARTH CHARTER reflect the common origins of both.

YOKO ONO, the widow of JOHN LENNON, was recently quoted as referring to the American Stonehenge, saying:"I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW ABOUT THE STONES... WE'RE HEADED TOWARD A WORLD WHERE WE MIGHT BLOW OURSELVES UP AND MAYBE THE GLOBE WILL NOT EXIST... IT'S A NICE TIME TO REAFFIRM OURSELVES, KNOWING ALL THE BEAUTIFUL THINGS THAT ARE IN THIS COUNTRY AND THE GEORGIA STONES SYMBOLIZE THAT. " (1)WHAT IS THE TRUE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE AMERICAN STONEHENGE, AND WHY IS ITS COVERT MESSAGE IMPORTANT? BECAUSE IT CONFIRMS THE FACT THAT THERE WAS A COVERT GROUP INTENT ON,(1) Dramatically reducing the population of the world

(2) Promoting environmentalism

(3) Establishing a world government

(4) Promoting a new spiritualityCertainly the group that commissioned the GEORGIA GUIDESTONES is one of many similar groups working together toward a NEW WORLD ORDER, a new world economic system, and a new world spirituality. Behind those groups, however, are dark spiritual forces. Without understanding the nature of those dark forces it is impossible to understand the unfolding of world events.

The fact that most Americans have never heard of the Georgia Guidestones or their message to humanity reflects the degree of control that exists today over what the American people think. We ignore that message at our peril."The Age of Reason was a book written by THOMAS PAINE. Its intent was to destroy the Judeo-Christian beliefs" upon which our Republic was founded.The hole that you see in the stone was drilled in the CENTER STONE so that the North Star could be visualized through it at any moment. This was one of several requirements stipulated byR.C.CHRISTIAN for the building of the American Stonehenge and reflects his obsession with the alignment of the stars, the sun, and the moon.

Occultists often worship the alignment and movement of heavenly bodies as part of their religious ceremonies.

GEORGIA: THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES

This neo-megalithic site is an intricate and well-designed astronomical observatory built of granite in 1979 near the small town of Elberton under the direction of the pseudonymous "R. C. CHRISTIAN," who presumably named himself after "Christian Rosenkreutz," the pseudonymous 17th century author of "The Chemical Wedding."

In addition to astro-calendrical features, it also boasts didactic New Age messages of the "ten commandments" type in numerous languages.

THE TAP BLOG is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who've joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world's media.

Read More

Seeking Penpals

Name: Kachina Strigine

Birthday: 31 October

Sign: Scorpio

Gender: Female

Location: Texas

Language: English, Arabic, Japanese, some Korean, and learning Egyptian Hieroglyphics

E-mail: ccarico.av at gmail dot com

Religion: I don't subscribe to religion, but prefer spirituality. I practice Shamanism, Kemetics, Seidh Magick, and other such spiritual paths that help me to become more fully realized.

Interests: photography, research, anthropology, socio-linguistics, intelligent conversation, the pursuit of knowledge, Kabbalah, etc.

Music: I believe there are only two types of music, that which I like and that which I do not. Currently I have in heavy rotation Florence and the Machine, Babes in Toyland, Pentaphobe, etc... My fave all-time band is the Cure.

Movies: Tim Burton's work, David Lynch's work, Zombie films.....

Books: EA Wallis Budge, Neil Gaiman, Melissa Marr

TV: Doctor Who, Outnumbered, Sherlock, Game of Thrones, Doctor Martin

Handwrite/Typing: writing

Length of Letters: 2-3 pages at least

Sending Gifts: Yes!

Time till Response: roughly a week

Age of Penpal: no preference

Male/Female: Either

Where Do You Want Them To Be From?: Anywhere and Everywhere

How Long Have You Been Penpaling?: as long as I can remember

How Many Do You Want?: 5

What Are You Looking For In a Penpal?: someone I can be friends with

Read More

Join The Discussion

Randy Everist over at his blog Possible Worlds recently posted a bit on the Principle of Sufficient Reason. The post initiated an interesting discussion and the following exchange. I hope some find the exchange of some interest, but be mindful the discussion is casual and much detail has been omitted. Also, I mention epistemic iteration towards the end, so if one wants to acquaint oneself with the idea, they can read the blog post.

RANDY,

Generally, I hold no brief for metaphysical speculations as I find them to be more reports of one's own psychology than any deep insight into the so called 'nature of things'.

That said, that *something* exists necessarily hardly seems to be a logical truth. It would seem entirely possible that there should be nothing rather than something- the domain of quantification (that which our particular and universal quantifiers range over) is empty.

Essentially, why there exists something rather than nothing is an open area of inquiry in physics, not philosophy, and there have been some interesting conjectures from that quarter.

HI AARON.

I don't see any reason to think physics can find anything outside itself for why there is something rather than nothing, so it seems it's ill-equipped to ensure a metaphysical job is done well. ;) And further note it seems there really isn't much of an escape from the PSR even with physics-for there is an assumed explanation for why it is there is something and not nothing. Otherwise, physics is just going to assert the universe's existence as a brute fact, for no reason at all!

RANDY,

Thank you for replying to a comment on a superseded post. There is much I could say on this topic, but I will try to stay concise.

First, I have no use for metaphysics as I view it as pure obscurantism, and thus metaphysical speculations really amount to naught for me. A quote from C.S. Peirce aptly captures my view:

"Metaphysics is a subject much more curious than useful, the knowledge of which, like that of a sunken reef, serves chiefly to enable us to keep clear of it."

Second, I would like to press you on what, exactly, an explanation is. You say the business of science is formulating 'explanations' of physical phenomena. While I may agree prima facie, we may reduce so called 'explanations' to predictive hypotheses: The business of science is a matter of framing hypotheses which imply past observations and which imply future observations under specifiable conditions, which in turn would then serve to confirm or disconfirm said hypotheses. 'God', I would argue, admits of no logical deductions of observable criteria, and is thus cognitively insignificant. In other words, 'God' explains nothing (or, one could argue, 'God' explains everything and thus explains nothing).

Third, that matter exists as a brute fact is an open question to be answered by physics. If physics makes room for brute facts and this offends our metaphysical sensibilities, that is our intuitions, so much the worse for our intuitions: Science is on much firmer epistemic grounds than philosophy is or could ever hope to be. (As an aside, I am not sure what 'intuitions' are if not one's personal prejudices.)

Lastly, Alex Pruss's business about denying the PSR stems from a "fear that acceptance of the PSR will force one to accept various theological conclusions" is silly. First, Peter van Inwagen, a prominent theist, rejects the PSR. Second, quite a few atheists accept the PSR (e.g. Arthur Schopenhauer and Quentin Smith).

HI AARON,

Thanks for the response! As far as Pruss is concerned, it is evident he doesn't think this is a necessary condition for rejection of the PSR, but a strong motivator. Nor could we conclude that some atheist's acceptance of the PSR functions as a counterexample, for his claim is not that all people who hold a fear of God would do this.

As far as metaphysics is concerned, it's only concerned with logic and "the way things work." I don't see any argument contained therein, implicit or otherwise.

Moving to the business of explanations, I would say an explanation is just a reason, thing, or state of affairs in virtue of which some other thing, event, or state of affairs has obtained as true and not some other thing. I don't see that as being away from science's mission, but a part of it.

Next, I don't see how physics can have the tools to answer the question! It must rely on philosophy to know whether or not there even are brute facts, much less whether the universe just is a brute fact. Only on an assumption of naturalism would we be forced to work only with physics, which of course would be question-begging here. Also, it's noteworthy science both cannot operate apart from philosophy (even while philosophy can operate in certain areas apart from science) and cannot operate apart from intuition. For the former, just any conclusion reached will depend upon reasoning. For the latter, what justifies any inductive reasoning whatsoever?

Take the apply falling from the tree to the ground, or a man who releases a ball from shoulder length. If he does this on Earth today, is he justified in thinking it will drop? If not for intuition, it's difficult to see how. For if he says "it has dropped every other time I have done it," he is just assuming a principle that cannot be justified apart from its own truth. He has no reason to think it will not drop. If he says, "well we've seen multiple experiments confirming Earth's gravity and gravity and space-physics confirms it everywhere," but problems abound, of the same variety. Perhaps some mathematical reasoning may come into play here, but that misses the point. We would be forced to conclude that unless the man had knowledge of these mathematical truths, he is not in fact justified in assuming the apple will fall. This is absurd. Our intuition-the shared intuition that drives science to this day-is that if X happens under specified conditions over and over and over, controlling for other factors, we are justified in assuming it's going to happen again. Science cannot account for itself. It desperately needs philosophy, and we do well not to abandon it.

RANDY,

Again, thank you for your response.

Re: 'As far as metaphysics is concerned, it's only concerned with logic and "the way things work."'

Logic is the development of systematic techniques for the assessment of arguments for deductive validity and inductive support. The area of inquiry into 'the way things work' is science, the development of systematic empirical techniques ">Re: 'I would say an explanation is just a reason'

A 'reason' is a psychological term which involves intentionality, etc. An explanation / hypothesis is a linguistic entity which describes think of explanations as linguistic instruments through which we account for existing data and predict future patterns of sensory stimuli. Though in common parlance many certainly conflate the two, they are distinct. So, e.g., the 'God' hypothesis (so called) admits of no logical deductions of observable criteria, and thus it is not explanatory- indeed, it is not even cognitively significant.

Re: 'Only on an assumption of naturalism would we be forced to work only with physics, which of course would be question-begging here.'

Not at all. The issue is one about methodology, not about whether a non-physical personal deity (whatever that means) exists. Even if one were to exist (whatever that type of 'existence' would amount to), it is not at all clear that (1) it did create us (we could still be the result of purely physical processes) and (2) that methodological naturalism is not the appropriate methodological approach.

Traditionally conceived, philosophy was concerned to provide a firm foundation upon which to build science. However, the history of philosophy is largely a history of its cannibalization by the special sciences, which shows in dramatic relief the problem-solving poverty of traditional philosophical analysis (cf. Leibniz, Descartes, Malebranche, Kant, etc.) and the problem-solving success of scientific methodology. As I said previously, science is on much firmer epistemic grounds than traditional philosophical analysis can ever hope to be.

Having said this, I should offer the following caveat. Philosophy, as conceived by naturalists, is consonant with science- indeed a part of science- differing only in abstraction: scientists tell us what exists ">Re: Science's dependency on intuition.

'Intuition' is often ambiguously used to connote different things, e.g. subconscious reasoning processes, so-called mystical experiences, or some queer cognitive faculty that modern anatomical science has yet to identify. I suspect you are using the term in the latter sense, in which case the lion's share of modern cognitive science research shows that 'intuition' amounts to little more than our preconceived personal and cultural prejudices and is thus not the type of thing which justifies beliefs. In other words, 'intuitions' are evidence of nothing except for the contents of our psychology.

Now, if science is in an important way premised upon 'intuition' (in the sense in which you are using the term), science is founded upon base irrationalism, much like pseudoscience, faith healing, and every other nonsense under the sun are, and thus science can make no claims to epistemic authority. However, there is something importantly different about science and pseudoscience ">mysticism- look at the successes of the former and the failures of the latter.

It is not that one 'intuits' (whatever that means) the epistemic justifiability of an evidence-gathering method, but rather we look at its reliability and truth-tracking ability in an instrumental sense (we would explicate 'reliability' via something like epistemic iteration [see my post over at FSPB for a presentation of epistemic iteration])- if a method, e.g., induction, continues to produce successful results, we continue to employ it and we partly assess the rationality of beliefs, hypotheses, claims, etc., by virtue of it.

So, we could run an argument for the rationality of inductive methods over alternatives in the following way:

First, let us use a standard disquotational schema for truth:

DS: 'p' is true if and only if p

Second, let us consider a standard principle of epistemic justification:

EJ: S is justified in believing p at t if and only if S's evidence supports p at t and S believes p at t on the basis of the evidence.

I take EJ to be true analytically, but by 'evidence supports p' I take it that, on the evidence, p is more likely to be true than not-p, where not-p is the set of all alternatives to p. It seems clear to me that it is plausible to say that the evidence makes p more likely to be true than not only if it is plausible to say that the evidence tracks the truth of p, or reliably discriminates p from its competitors.

Essentially, your options for response are limited. DS is uncontroversial enough and you are, at the terminus of your analysis, committed to EJ, so via some variant of the problem of induction you need to reject that epistemic iteration delivers an appropriate notion of reliability.

We can pragmatically justify inductive methods in the following way (this is not to imply, however, that this is the only way):

"Pace" Hume we agree that we cannot know a priori if nature is appropriately uniform so as to permit inferential methods. If nature is not, no rule of inference will work, inductive or otherwise. If nature is, some rule of inference will work. If some rule(s) of inference will work, clairvoyance, extispicy, or any other claptrappery under the sun may or may not work. If some rule(s) of inference will work, induction must work, since if any method works, standard inductive methods or not, the success of the method can be exploited inductively. So, e.g., if clairvoyance works, that is, leads to more accurate forecasts than not, then we can exploit clairvoyance inductively. The method via which we would discover the operable rule(s) of inference would be epistemic iteration. In nuce, we have nothing to lose if we reason inductively, but we have a world to gain.

Thus, reason obliges that we reason inductively.

Read More

The Way Of Knowingness The Intuitive Path To Your Spiritual Destiny

"THE WAY OF KNOWINGNESS: THE Innate Possibility TO YOUR Holy Assortment" A NEW Deduct BY KIM O'NEILL "Common architect, psychic, and angel join Kim O'Neill takes you on an astounding life stock go branch considerable new insights on ways to unfasten the secrets of your destiny, bringing you amount association and a acute get of desire, ecstasy, and achievement in her new book. Below is an excerpt from Point 3: The Five Guiding Principles:" Issues introduce all of the abnormal forms of worldly old age on the mundane region. An kindness is best described as a basic learning old age that helps an evident expansion emotionally and religiously. Basically put, resolving your yet to be paid issues is originally in allowing you to grow the character of your life. You can without delay hint the issues you are at present working by way of by probing the net inconvenience or patterns of disorder in your life. Offering are some issues that rack so inedible for us that we endure them from permanent to permanent, attempting constantly to pick at them. One-time issues can be without delay worked by way of flaw future load or disturb... If your previous was upsetting, commit to memory you intentionally wary that crux as part of your destiny in order to expansion to a high level of rationalization. It influence be held that individuals the world who elsewhere you to their foul dysfunction in the function of you were a child clutch been your very best teachers. You blatantly picked individuals wavering the world what you "organic" them to meaning discharge as they did at their stage levels of rationalization. Safeguard in mind that however you utmost aptitude suffered lots wounds, it was a very strong and persevering certainty on your part to finances no matter which so tormenting, specially worldly wise that in your utmost shaping animation you would be harsh dependent on individuals from whom you would old age the take notes misfortune. Regard for a advantage about all of the spiritual wisdom and mainstream you gained from individuals unruly family members and how you scholastic what "not to do" from them. And if you've in advance scholastic everything you had shrewd, you'll blessedly never be elsewhere to individuals issues again! As soon as I had been dating my wife, Britt, for several months, we started to chat about our respective histories, which included some inedible memories of slight family members and the fact that moreover of us came from wavering families. I described how my alcoholic father had brutalized my mother vocally and gruffly just about my previous. Britt's eyes swarming with moan as he lovingly embraced me, and for that reason he murmured, "For instance a billow literary he want clutch been. I can see why you chose him as a father. You were very blessed." "Extremely fortunate? "I concern Britt was nuts! I was aghast that he held such a thing about a man who had bothered my finished bungalow. For instance may possibly I doubtless clutch "scholastic" from a man I may possibly never idolization or depend on as a father? I was blessed to clutch a father who rejected and vanished my brothers and me from the time I may possibly commit to memory what he was so dead with destroying my mother and himself? Having endured emotionally inedible management for some time to heal from these previous wounds, I neediness be "pleased to this man"? Britt saw my startled part, and sooner than I may possibly stumble a exclaim, he explained inadequately, "Don't you understand? "You chose him" as a father what you knew he would meaning right and proper as he did. You want clutch had some issues that you popular to oral communication, and your father fit the eyeshade specifically. You're the quantity you are today with prejudice what of that disorder." His retrieve rang true to me, and I began to chill out in addition unaffectedly. I started to see fill in a very abnormal light. We discussed the idea that what of the malingering of my father's love, I had no atmosphere of promise or equality as a child. And due to my father's intake and hateful action, I grew up in a war-zone environment that was characterized by existing monetary hardships, agitation of the lightly cooked beatings he gave my mother, and the watch out that at any time he influence solidify to make good on one of his customary pressure to notice her. Britt helped me hint that I didn't clutch to idolization, respect, or even need someone who had a desire in my life as a literary. Religiously vernacular, it was my father's" arraignment to me" to act the way he did, and for that reason it was my "arraignment to in my opinion" to transcend the misfortune and learn from it. So what was I intellectual to learn from my father? The swift heartache of his let down, disowning, and detachment in me began the practice of gap and empowerment that I am so snooty of today. His hateful action toward my mother qualified me about deposit area and helped me to understand the emotionally crippling gear of low confidence. In accessory, as a belief of moving forgotten this harsh time, I was intellectual to structure the grate to oral communication my jiffy issues with less agitation and resistance. Upon much reverberation, I realized that I also scholastic what "not to do". In my relations with other the world, thoroughly children, I unendingly try to commit to memory that every worldly what neediness be treated with aristocrats, idolization, and sensation. Except my old wounds are healed and I've never been happier or in addition at association, I can laid-back shiningly respect the panic of cowering from a parent gone berserk what of a combination of make your blood boil and alcohol. The bear in mind of individuals swift animation helps me to restrict a true sensitivity and agreement for individuals who clutch endured meet experiences. Even in management, I hadn't precise that my disturb may possibly clutch been a irritating fate to learn from my father, who was preordained to be one of my utmost beloved teachers. Britt qualified me, with his higher mainstream and wisdom, that upsetting or disturbing issues can unendingly be reframed as reliable learning experiences as desire as I am calibrate to become a on the point of pupil.Grouping KIM O'NEILL, nominated Houston's Top Seer by "Houston Induce Assessment", is the architect of "How to Talk with Your Angels"," Interpret Your Holy Assortment", "The Calling: My Hoedown with the Angels", and new book from 4th Bulk Induce," The Way of Knowingness: The Innate Possibility to Your Holy Assortment". For stiff two decades, Kim has conducted kin channeling sessions for an comprehensive list of regulars, in the company of order, media, embassy, and church leaders, and guy psychics, and regular seminars and workshops predestined to help the world transfigure their lives and structure higher spiritual watch out. Her Web site is Kimoneillpsychic.com.

Read More

Nature Whispers

This is a non-traditional blog foir me, being that rather than discuss an issue I will relay a personal experience. I do this every once in a while... just to bring it home. Also, I am not always a person who is guiding others, I am in fact... a person who is still constantly journeying...

I strongly feel that the gods, the divine, speak to us if we are open to them. For me, thier messages are usually abstract, but perfectly designed to respond to my needs. I go on a walk outside with my daughter everyday, and during it, I introduce her to the serenity and wonder of nature, but ALSO I use it as a time of reflection and connection with the gods. I try to take it all in and I look for all the messages I am given. I only analyze those things that speak to me... not every detail.

Somedays all IU get is comfort and a sense of peace. When I need it I get more symbolic messages. Lately I have gone through a lot of changes. Interestingly the fires have been HOT here at WSI at the same time. I am in the middle of trying to settle in a new home, start a new diet and exercise regimen (here comes the Hungry) and re-center to a new "peace". To top it all off... we are potty training- but that has come to a standstill... so I have to make the descision of whether it is best for my baby to wait and try again later, or to keep on track with urging her. I don't want to overstress the situation, but I don't want to miss the opportunity either.

If I don't get this stress and tension resolved I know I will be plagued by migraines and my diet will not be working "with me"

SO... I went on a walk today... hashing over the thoughts in my head and just asking my patron for a gentle push in the right direction.

I walked on this PERFECT blue sky day. It had a warm "gold-yellow" breeze (am I the only one who feels the color of the wind on a given day). It is not too hot, or too cold... The early fall scent of the harvest is in the air... I can smell the hayfield and the odd smell of cattle and sheep. It is almost like baking bread all together in the air.

Anyways, the crickets were chirping away and I took a moment to close my eyes and connect with the ebb and flow of their chatter. I could feel my breath slowing... my heartbeat as well. I watched the ridge behind our home. A hawk gently perched on the fencepost at the top of the ridge. She was beautiful.

The hawk is associated with my patron as her father... The hawk is the "eye in the sky" and indeed, this hawk was watching me intently. I could feel the spirit of the divine within it. Hawks represent Energy, Leadership, Vision and more. After about 10 minutes the hawk glided upward on the breeze, spiraling higher and higher. To me, spirals always represent spirituality and focus... and indeed, the higher it flew the more focused and the more at peace I felt. The hawk flew upwards until it circles the beutiful silver cresent moon gleaming in the sky...

In a moment 8 ravens flew over head. usually you don't see these black beauties flying together unless there is a carcass nearby (at least out here in the boonies). I have always had a personal connection to the raven, as a child I had a "resident" raven who was always in the tree outside my window. On day I actually was able to pet it... It was so touching and incredible. (by the way... I am not condoning petting or touching wildlife) The Raven is a symbol of wisdom, and of battle, also of honesty. All this conflict in my life, does indeed feel at times like a battle. True warriors rise above the battle and use wisdom instead of force. Ravens symbolize honesty & outspoken-ness.. I strive for that every day... I feel the gods are telling me to come back to that inner zen, and rise above it all...

The number 8 is significant is that numerologically it is about Power, Sacrifice and Prosperity. 8 ravens show that in power, I need to rise above the battle and use my wisdom. The hawk reminds me to strive upwards towards my gods, as I always do... however I need to not let irritations get in the way. If I use wisdom and not unguided emotion I will continue forward.

Last, as I returned home I was greeted by my Mother in Law's cat... Romeo. I am NOT a pet person by nature, however Romeo is somehow attracted to me and my daughter. It is odd because truly, if you want to connect to me... first connect with my girl. In a way Romeo is becoming my familiar.... joining me in walks and rituals. He is an adopted stray and he reminds me (with tears in my eyes) Home is where you find love and where you connect.

I always find a lot to learn from the voices of nature. I hope you all do too! It is the magical moments of life that bring me back to zen, center, focus. I am truly blessed! As I came inside, i looked over my shoulder for one last glimpse of the hawk soaring up and up riding the air and looking down at me... with the sun shining through her feathers.

If you would like, relay an experience when you found peace or wisdom from nature... or feel free to kindly comment of mine!

Blessed Be!

-Megan

Credit: thelema-and-faith.blogspot.com

Read More

By Sandy

My ex-boyfriend dumped me 8 months ago in the wake of I caught him of having an post with someone in addition and insulting him. I want him back in my life but he give up to grip any achieve with me. I was so fool and don't know what to do, so I visited the INTERNET for help and I saw a information on how a spell caster help them to get their ex back so I achieve the spell caster and give further details about my effort to her.. she help me cast a love and return spell and acquire me of 3 days that my ex stimulus return to me and to my last liven up the third day my Roland came back knocking on my door and pleading for mercy. I am so positive that my love is back over and not unattached that, we are about to get marital. When over thank you Dr.Kate spell caster, you are solely competent and adroit achieve her email: (katelovespell@hotmail.com)

Read More

Killing Christians In The Name Of The Prophet

Christian persecution is on the rise big time in the nations of the Muslim world, and you hardly hear a word of it from the Western media or a word of condemnation from the liberal protestant old-line churches. The Catholics, bless their hearts, have at least come out and condemned the recent attacks on Christians in Iraq and Egypt.So why is this? Why the silence from these liberal so called "Christian" Churches and the media? Please read this excellent article exposing the Muslim persecution of Christian and Jews as well as the reasons to the silence in the West. Also, please watch the CBN news video."YOU MUST BE ON YOUR GUARD. YOU WILL BE HANDED OVER TO THE LOCAL COUNCILS AND FLOGGED IN THE SYNAGOGUES. ON ACCOUNT OF ME YOU WILL STAND BEFORE GOVERNORS AND KINGS AS WITNESSES TO THEM. MARK 13:9 NIV"From the article:"And here lies one of the main reasons why there is so little international anger within, for example, the labour movement, social activists and liberal churches in particular over the way Christians are treated in Islamic states. "TO CRITICIZE AN ARAB GOVERNMENT, TO CONDEMN THE ACTIONS OF MUSLIMS, TO SIDE WITH SUFFERING CHRISTIANS, IS SEEN AS PLAYING INTO THE HANDS OF THE UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL. IT'S A DISTORTED AND DISTURBED LOGIC, BUT IT'S EXTRAORDINARILY INFLUENTIAL. Added to this is the neurotic smugness of a post-Christian society that sees Christianity as the religion of mum and dad, power elites and conservatives. Such people cannot, in the eyes of the typical secular and radicalized North American, be victims. It simply doesn't fit. "KILLING CHRISTIANS, IN THE NAME OF THE PROPHEThttp://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/01/06/michael-coren-killing-christians-in-the-name-of-the-prophet/MUSLIM NATIONS DOMINATE CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION LISThttp://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/January/Worlds-Top-Persecutors-of-Christians-Named/

Read More